REPRODUCTIVE AUTONOMY: A HUMAN RIGHTS REAPPRAISAL OF MEDICAL TERMINATION OF PREGNANCY LAWS IN THE CONTEMPORARY INTERNATIONAL LEGAL ORDER

Authors

  • Shubhra Author
    Competing Interests

    The author declare that they have no competing financial, professional, institutional, or personal interests, relationships, or affiliations that could reasonably be perceived to have influenced the conduct of the research, the interpretation of the findings, or the preparation and publication of this manuscript.

  • Dr. Sanjiv Kumar Sinha Author
    Competing Interests

    The author declare that they have no competing financial, professional, institutional, or personal interests, relationships, or affiliations that could reasonably be perceived to have influenced the conduct of the research, the interpretation of the findings, or the preparation and publication of this manuscript.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67874/ijlcs.67

Keywords:

Human rights, women’s reproductive autonomy, medical termination of pregnancy laws, intersectional justice, substantive equality

Abstract

The acceptance of women’s reproductive autonomy as part and parcel of human rights framework evidence the gradual transition in the contemporary legal discourse pertaining to medical termination of pregnancy. However, it’s correctly observed “rights on paper do not always translate into rights in practice”, reflecting a significant gap between statutory guarantee and persistent reality. Critical perspective is adopted in order to analyse the effectiveness of the medical termination of pregnancy laws as well as human rights framework in ensuring the reproductive autonomy. Doctrinal and analytical methodology has been adopted to examine how the inequalities intrinsically rooted in the state legislations and societal structure negates the concept of reproductive justice. The present paper comprised of four chapters. First chapter is Introduction which talks about the conceptualization of reproductive autonomy as human rights; Literature Review is dealt in second chapter; third chapter deals with the evolution of legislative enactments pertaining to termination of pregnancy and its limitations; fourth chapter deals with the concluding observations and analyses the barriers in the way of attaining the goal of reproductive justice. Through the present paper, researcher ensures to highlight the inadequacy in adopting right based approach while enacting medical termination of pregnancy laws. Researcher concludes that, even if human rights play a decisive role behind the legitimization of reproductive autonomy, but its insufficiency exists without including the concepts of inclusivity, intersectional justice and substantive equality.

Author Biographies

  • Shubhra

    PhD Research Scholar, University Department of Law, TMBU, Bhagalpur. 

  • Dr. Sanjiv Kumar Sinha

    Assistant Professor of Law, Principal of TNB Law College, TMBU, Bhagalpur. 

References

Barak A (2012) Proportionality: Constitutional Rights and Their Limitations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Baxi U (2001) Gender and Reproductive Rights in India: Problems and Prospects for the New Millennium. UNFPA, New Delhi, p. 72.

Council on Foreign Relations (2026) Abortion Law: Global Comparisons. Available at: https://www.cfr.org/article/abortion-law-global-comparisons.

France (2024) Constitutional Law No. 2024-200 of 8 March 2024 relating to the freedom to resort to voluntary termination of pregnancy. Journal officiel de la République française, No. 0058, 9 March 2024.

Hessini L (2005) Global progress in abortion advocacy and policy: An assessment of the decade since ICPD. Reproductive Health Matters. doi:10.1016/S0968-8080(05)25168-6.

Jaiswal JVN (2009) Legal Aspects of Pregnancy, Delivery and Abortion. Eastern Book Company, Delhi.

Siegel RB and Greenhouse L (eds) (2026) Betty Friedan, Abortion: A Woman's Civil Right (1969), in Before Roe v Wade H2O Casebooks. Open Casebook. Available at: https://opencasebook.org/casebooks/109-roe-at-50/resources/1.2.2-betty-friedan-abortion-a-womans-civil-right-1969-in-siegel-and-greenhouse-before-roe-v-wade/.

UNFPA (2014) Reproductive Rights Are Human Rights. Human Rights Publications, United Nations Organization, p. 23.

United States Supreme Court (1973) Roe v Wade, 410 U.S. 113.

United States Supreme Court (2022) Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization, 597 U.S. 215.

Justice K.S. Puttaswamy & Anr. v Union of India & Ors (2017) 2017 INSC 1235.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-31

How to Cite

REPRODUCTIVE AUTONOMY: A HUMAN RIGHTS REAPPRAISAL OF MEDICAL TERMINATION OF PREGNANCY LAWS IN THE CONTEMPORARY INTERNATIONAL LEGAL ORDER . (2026). International Journal of Law, Culture & Society, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.67874/ijlcs.67

Similar Articles

1-10 of 59

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.