FROM SELF-IDENTIFICATION TO STATE RECOGNITION: THE CHANGING LEGAL LANDSCAPE OF TRANSGENDER RIGHTS IN INDIA
Keywords:
Transgender Rights, Self- Identification, Constitutional Morality, Gender Identity Recognition, Bureaucratisation of IdentityAbstract
There have been substantial developments in the domain of jurisprudence regarding constitutional acceptance of gender identity over the last decade. It was held by the Supreme Court of India in the case of National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India (2014), it is one such important landmark decision which held that the right of an individual to determine his or her own gender is part of the right of personal liberty and dignity protected under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. However, the legislative trajectory following in these matters shows the gradual weakening of the concept of selfidentification and personal liberty. Even though the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, passed in 2019 faced several criticism for incorporating state-administered certification measures that negated some aspects of NALSA guidelines, the recently passed Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Act, 2026 heralds a much more significant move away from the earlier approach. Indeed, this new law in making marks a complete paradigm shift from the existing rights-based and autonomy-driven model of identity recognition towards one that is essentially state-controlled and conditional. This study analyzes the constitutional ramifications of this paradigm shift along three major axes: first, the restriction on self-identification as a fundamental right; second, the consequent shrinking of protection for transgender people; and third, identity recognition process based on bureaucratization, making individual dignity dependent on administrative approval. In addition, the paper highlights how these developments raise serious constitutional questions under Articles 14, 19, and 21, suggesting that the amendment act not only fails to promote the constitutional values set forth in the NALSA judgment but may lead to the perpetuation of systemic discrimination by making individual identity dependent on the whims of the state.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tanisha Mitra, Alishba Sheikh (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the International Journal of Law, Culture & Society (IJLCS) the right of first publication. All published articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, adaptation, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are properly credited. Authors are responsible for ensuring that submitted work is original and does not infringe the rights of others.