SECTION 69 BNS: FRAUDULENT CONSENT, CRIMINAL LIABILITY AND POTENTIAL MISUSE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67874/ijlcs.68Keywords:
Section 69 BNS, Sexual offences, False promise to marry, Consent and misconception of fact, Deceitful means, Evidentiary burden in criminal lawAbstract
Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (“BNS”) creates a distinct criminal offence for sexual intercourse obtained by deceitful means, including a false promise of marriage, made without any intention of fulfilment, in cases that fall short of rape. This article examines the doctrinal foundations, evidentiary structure, and practical operation of Section 69. It situates the provision within the existing jurisprudence on consent and misconception of fact developed under Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code, and traces how the Supreme Court’s insistence on proof of dishonest intention “from the inception” of the promise, rather than mere non-fulfilment, has shaped the boundaries of criminal liability. The article then identifies the central evidentiary difficulty that Section 69 poses: because the accused’s state of mind at the time of the promise is rarely susceptible to direct proof, courts and investigators are compelled to infer intention from surrounding circumstances, creating a risk that the eventual breakdown of a relationship is read backwards as evidence of original deceit. Building on this concern, the article considers the potential for misuse of Section 69 and the procedural safeguards, including impartial investigation, judicial scrutiny at pre-trial stages, and the inherent powers of the High Courts, that can mitigate this risk without discouraging genuine complaints of sexual exploitation. A comparative analysis of the approaches taken in England and Wales, Canada, and Australia demonstrates that other common-law jurisdictions confine criminal liability for deception to forms of dishonesty that bear a sufficiently direct and material connection to the complainant’s consent, rather than treating deception in the abstract as criminal. Drawing on this comparative experience, the article concludes with a set of recommendations aimed at preserving the protective function of Section 69 while guarding against the over-criminalisation of failed relationships and genuine, if broken, promises.
References
Indian Penal Code, No. 45 of 1860, §§ 90, 375 (India).
Anurag Soni v. State of Chhattisgarh, (2019) 13 SCC 1 (India).
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, No. 45 of 2023, § 69 (India).
Prashant Sharma, “Deceitful Promises and Vitiated Consent: A Critical Examination of Women’s Rights under Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023” (2025).
Uday v. State of Karnataka, (2003) 4 SCC 46 (India).
Deepak Gulati v. State of Haryana, (2013) 7 SCC 675 (India).
Pramod Suryabhan Pawar v. State of Maharashtra, (2019) 9 SCC 608 (India).
Dhruvaram Murlidhar Sonar v. State of Maharashtra, (2019) 18 SCC 191 (India).
Rukmini Sen, “Pyaar, Promise, Dhoka: Feminist Questions to Law—Commentary on Uday v. State of Karnataka,” 56(1) VRÜ | WCL 104 (2023).
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, No. 45 of 2023, § 69 (India).
Wing Cheong Chan, “False Promise to Marry and Other Forms of Sex by Deception in India and Singapore,” 34(1) National Law School of India Review 82 (2022).
Simranjot Kaur & Harmanpreet Kaur, “Consent in Rape Law in India: A Critical Analysis of Legal Standards and Judicial Interpretation under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,” 4(2) Indian Journal of Law 1 (2026).
Vaibhav Gandhi & Muskan Gandhi, “From Promise to Punishment: Analysis of Section 69 of BNS, 2023,” 6(6) International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (2024).
Shubh Arora, “The Labyrinth of Rape by False Promise of Marriage: A Critical Analysis,” 9(1) NLIU Law Review 170 (2020).
State of Haryana v. Ch. Bhajan Lal, 1992 Supp. (1) SCC 335 (India).
Sexual Offences Act 2003, c. 42, § 74 (UK).
Sexual Offences Act 2003, c. 42, §§ 75–76 (UK).
Sexual Offences Act 2003, c. 42, § 76(2) (UK).
R v. McNally, [2013] EWCA Crim 1051 (Eng.).
R v. Hutchinson, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 346, 2014 SCC 19 (Can.).
R v. Kirkpatrick, [2022] 2 S.C.R. 480, 2022 SCC 33 (Can.).
Jianlin Chen, “Fraudulent Sex Criminalisation in Australia: Disparity, Disarray and the Underrated Procurement Offence,” 43(2) UNSW Law Journal 581 (2020).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Raushan Kumar, Deepak Patel (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the International Journal of Law, Culture & Society (IJLCS) the right of first publication. All published articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, adaptation, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are properly credited. Authors are responsible for ensuring that submitted work is original and does not infringe the rights of others.