DEEPFAKE CRIMES AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE: EVALUATING INDIA'S LEGAL RESPONSE UNDER THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023

Authors

  • Kimika Bhardwaj Author
    Competing Interests

    The author declare that they have no competing financial, professional, institutional, or personal interests, relationships, or affiliations that could reasonably be perceived to have influenced the conduct of the research, the interpretation of the findings, or the preparation and publication of this manuscript.

  • Dr. Shruti Goyal Author
    Competing Interests

    The author declare that they have no competing financial, professional, institutional, or personal interests, relationships, or affiliations that could reasonably be perceived to have influenced the conduct of the research, the interpretation of the findings, or the preparation and publication of this manuscript.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67874/ijlcs.62

Keywords:

Deepfakes, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Synthetic Media, Personality Rights, Digital Criminal Justice

Abstract

The criminalisation of synthetic media in India has not been a planned phenomenon; it is the result of a nineteenth-century categorisation of media that was designed to address nineteenth-century harms. This article makes a doctrinal analysis of the current legal response to deepfake crimes under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 ("BNS"), read together with the Information Technology Act, 2000, the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 and the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Amendment Rules, 2026. It argues that the BNS was drafted in the very period in which generative AI was mainstreamed in India, yet was formulated without any awareness of this new category of synthetic media, and hence merely re-numbers rather than resolves the interpretive tension that the Indian Penal Code, 1860 had already shown when confronted with morphed images and voice cloning. The article examines the constitutional underpinnings in Articles 19 and 21, the developing personality and publicity-rights jurisprudence of the Delhi High Court, and a comparative study of the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act and the United States' TAKE IT DOWN Act, to show how India's personation, forgery, defamation and voyeurism provisions together create a disjointed, victim-unfriendly, and largely civil rather than criminal enforcement pathway. 

Author Biographies

  • Kimika Bhardwaj

    LL.M. in Criminal Law, Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law, Patiala

  • Dr. Shruti Goyal

    Associate Professor of Law, Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law, Patiala

References

Press Release, Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology, Advisory to Intermediaries on Deepfakes and AI-Generated Content (Dec. 26, 2023).

Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology, Frequently Asked Questions on the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Amendment Rules, 2026 (Feb. 10, 2026).

Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Amendment Rules, 2026, G.S.R. 120(E) (India) (notified Feb. 10, 2026).

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, No. 45 of 2023, India Code (2023) (effective July 1, 2024).

K.D. Gaur, Textbook on the Indian Penal Code (7th ed. 2023).

Ratanlal & Dhirajlal, The Indian Penal Code (35th ed. 2022).

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, No. 45 of 2023, India Code §§ 2(9), 336 (2023).

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, No. 45 of 2023, India Code (2023); Information Technology Act, No. 21 of 2000, India Code (2000); Digital Personal Data Protection Act, No. 22 of 2023, India Code (2023).

Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, G.S.R. 139(E), as amended by Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Amendment Rules, 2026, G.S.R. 120(E) (India).

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, No. 45 of 2023, India Code §§ 75, 77, 319, 336, 351, 356 (2023).

Information Technology Act, No. 21 of 2000, India Code §§ 66C, 66D, 66E (2000); Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, No. 45 of 2023, India Code (2023).

Digital Personal Data Protection Act, No. 22 of 2023, India Code § 33 (2023).

Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Amendment Rules, 2026, G.S.R. 120(E), r. 3 (India).

R. Rajagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu, MANU/SC/0056/1995.

Kunal Kamra v. Union of India, 2024:BHC-OS:14750-DB, Writ Petition (L) No. 9792 of 2023 (Bom. H.C. Sept. 20, 2024) (India).

Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 Laying Down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act), 2024 O.J. (L 1689), art. 50.

Information Technology Act, No. 21 of 2000, India Code § 79 (2000); Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Amendment Rules, 2026, rr. 3, 7 (India).

Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, art. 50(2), (4).

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, No. 45 of 2023, India Code §§ 77, 319, 336, 356 (2023).

Ensuring Likeness, Voice, and Image Security Act, Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-25-1101 et seq. (2024).

TAKE IT DOWN Act, Pub. L. No. 119-12, 139 Stat. 55 (2025).

Downloads

Published

2026-08-18

How to Cite

DEEPFAKE CRIMES AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE: EVALUATING INDIA’S LEGAL RESPONSE UNDER THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023. (2026). International Journal of Law, Culture & Society, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.67874/ijlcs.62

Similar Articles

1-10 of 55

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.